downstairs Shi Zuzhui the face of his son to steal after the death of
the situation, a pair of old parents proceedings, claims to theft by a total of
67 million yuan. Recently Puma
Wheelspin Shoes, Ningbo Jiangbei court decision so bizarre disputes
the right to life.
few days ago, Mr. Li, who lives in Jiangbei suddenly being accused, while he stood on the dock's sake, but he did not think.
plaintiff Chen couples because of an accident took place in 2010 to prosecute Lee. Lao Chen couple suggested that one day in September 2010, their son, Chen came to the Lee family, somehow from their home, fall, and noon the following day north face outlet store, the old couple received a police station notification that his son is dead. An old married couple, said to the police station to inquire about the specific circumstances when they learned that the son is falling from the defendant Lee family, the police's conclusion is falling, accidental death Puma Future Cat, not start an investigation. However, the old couple, son of the defendant home, defendant bears the obligation to protect its security, but the defendant neglect to fulfill this obligation, which shall bear civil liability. An old married couple hope the court to order Mr. Lee compensation for funeral expenses, compensation for death, the spirit of solatium, a total of 670,168 yuan by the defendant to bear the costs of litigation.
subsequent sitting, the old couple to change the statement that his son is terrified by Lee falls dead end, Mr. Lee to civil liability.
this sense to get into the body of a lawsuit Lee shouted out of luck. He described in court at the time of the incident process: Chen falls in their own homes to steal from the burglary to escape falls Karen Millen One Shoulder Dresses, no direct contacts between yourself and the Chen; himself discovered the burglary. Chen has fled. When he opened the window and saw that Chen had fled to a canopy on six of seven floors. In this process, their instinct, he shouted out
after the court investigation, finds that the plaintiff son of Chen in the early hours of September 4, 2010, after implementation of the theft in the Lee family, climbing from the window falls dead in the escape process. Chen was born in 1982, at the time of the incident is an adult with full capacity for civil conduct their risk for the implementation of the theft in the morning to climb tall buildings should have been foreseen. The plaintiff that the plaintiff son into the defendant home, defendant bears the statement can not be established to protect its security obligations; plaintiff claims the plaintiff son Chen falls dead UGG Greenfield, frightened by the defendant only requested the defendant to bear the civil liability claim, The court shall not support. The same time, the court held that, in September 2010, the police Chen killed in accident investigation, has issued a Therefore, the plaintiff thereon litigation is beyond the limitation of actions.
Qiong Zhu Radha
few days ago, Mr. Li, who lives in Jiangbei suddenly being accused, while he stood on the dock's sake, but he did not think.
plaintiff Chen couples because of an accident took place in 2010 to prosecute Lee. Lao Chen couple suggested that one day in September 2010, their son, Chen came to the Lee family, somehow from their home, fall, and noon the following day north face outlet store, the old couple received a police station notification that his son is dead. An old married couple, said to the police station to inquire about the specific circumstances when they learned that the son is falling from the defendant Lee family, the police's conclusion is falling, accidental death Puma Future Cat, not start an investigation. However, the old couple, son of the defendant home, defendant bears the obligation to protect its security, but the defendant neglect to fulfill this obligation, which shall bear civil liability. An old married couple hope the court to order Mr. Lee compensation for funeral expenses, compensation for death, the spirit of solatium, a total of 670,168 yuan by the defendant to bear the costs of litigation.
subsequent sitting, the old couple to change the statement that his son is terrified by Lee falls dead end, Mr. Lee to civil liability.
this sense to get into the body of a lawsuit Lee shouted out of luck. He described in court at the time of the incident process: Chen falls in their own homes to steal from the burglary to escape falls Karen Millen One Shoulder Dresses, no direct contacts between yourself and the Chen; himself discovered the burglary. Chen has fled. When he opened the window and saw that Chen had fled to a canopy on six of seven floors. In this process, their instinct, he shouted out
after the court investigation, finds that the plaintiff son of Chen in the early hours of September 4, 2010, after implementation of the theft in the Lee family, climbing from the window falls dead in the escape process. Chen was born in 1982, at the time of the incident is an adult with full capacity for civil conduct their risk for the implementation of the theft in the morning to climb tall buildings should have been foreseen. The plaintiff that the plaintiff son into the defendant home, defendant bears the statement can not be established to protect its security obligations; plaintiff claims the plaintiff son Chen falls dead UGG Greenfield, frightened by the defendant only requested the defendant to bear the civil liability claim, The court shall not support. The same time, the court held that, in September 2010, the police Chen killed in accident investigation, has issued a Therefore, the plaintiff thereon litigation is beyond the limitation of actions.
Qiong Zhu Radha
No comments:
Post a Comment